Introduction
We consider pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras A1,A2,…,Al in Mpkn which are isomorphic to Mpk for k≥1, n≥2 and a prime number p with p≥3. The aim of this paper is to obtain the maximum l. The case p=2, n=2 and k=1 is shown in and the maximum is 4.
The motivations of this problem are followings. If a total system Mn⊗Mm has a statistical operator ρ, we can reconstruct the reduced density ρn(1)=Trmρ in the subsystem Mn, where Trm is a partial trace onto Mn. In order to get more information, we change the density ρ by an interaction. For a Hamiltonian H, the new state is
after the interaction. The new reduced density is ρn(2)=TrmW1ρW1∗. By using other interactions, we have a sequence of reduced states ρn(1),ρn(2),…,ρn(k). We want to determine the minimum k such that this sequence of reduced densities determines ρ.
Another reason comes from the relation to the mutually unbiased bases (MUB) problem. Given a orthonormal basis of an n-dimensional Hilbert space H, the linear operators diagonal in this basis form a maximal Abelian subalgebra of Mn≃B(H). Conversely if ∣ei⟩⟨ei∣ are minimal projections in a maximal Abelian subalgebra, then (∣ei⟩)i is a orthonormal basis. Two maximal Abelian subalgebras of Mn are quasi-orthogonal if and only if the two corresponding bases (ξi) and (ζj) are mutually unbiased (see Proposition 2.2), that is,
Mutually unbiased bases are very interesting from many point of view and the maximal number of such bases is not known for arbitrary n. We want to study mutually unbiased bases in terms of quasi-orthogonal subalgebras (see ).
In Section 2, we consider quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mpn which are isomorphic to Mp. In Section 3, quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mpkn which are isomorphic to Mpk are investigated.
A is a finite dimensional C∗-algebra with the usual trace Tr and is considered as a Hilbert space under the inner product
Two subalgebras A1 and A2 of A are called quasi-orthogonal if
The equivalent conditions of this definition are followings :
(a) For any A1∈A1 and A2∈A2,
(b) For any A1∈A1 and A2∈A2 with Tr(A1)=Tr(A2)=0,
The theory of quasi-orthogonal subalgebras is related to the theory of mutually unbiased bases. This is stated as follows:
From (a), we conclude that {ξi} and {ζj} are mutually unbiased bases if and only if the algebras generated by {Pi} and {Qj} are quasi-orthogonal. This prove the assertion. □
Now we consider the quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2=Mp⊗Mp which are isomorphic to Mp, where p is a prime number with p≥3. We will show that we can construct p2+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras.
Define the unitary operators W and S in Mp by
where λ=e2πi/p. Then these two unitary operators have following properties:
The set {SiWj}0≤i,j≤p−1 is a natural orthogonal basis of Mp.
From (1), Sk1Wl1 and Sk2Wl2 commute if and only if k1l2=k2l1 mod p.
We consider the commutativity condition iv in the context of a vector space over Zp, where Zp is a finite field with p elements. Let Zp4={(k1,l1,k2,l2)∣k1,l1,k2,l2∈Zp} be a vector space over Zp and define a natural homomorphism π (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4 to Mp⊗Mp by
where u=(k1,l1,k2,l2) and u′=(k1′,l1′,k2′,l2′). From (1),
Hence π(u) and π(u′) commute if and only if their symplectic product equals zero.
If π(u) and π(u′) are not commutative for u=(k1,l1,k2,l2),u′=(k1′,l1′,k2′,l2′)∈Zp4, then the algebra A generated by π(u) and π(u′) is isomorphic to Mp.
Proof. From the assumption, u∘u′=0. Define a map ρ from {S,Wu∘u′} to A by
From (2) and SWu∘u′=λ−u∘u′Wu∘u′S, the commutativity condition of π(u), π(u′) and that of S, Wu∘u′ are same. Therefore ρ can be extended to an isomorphism from Mp generated by S and Wu∘u′ to A. □
From this lemma, we need to find such u and u′. Let D be a non-zero integer in Zp with the requirement that D=k2 mod p for all k in Zp, i.e., D is not a quadratic residue of p. For any a0,a1∈Zp, we define a subspace of Zp4 by
where scalar multiplication and addition are defined by a natural way. Moreover put
The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). In particular, the subspaces expect (0,0,0,0) partition Zp4\{(0,0,0,0)}.
Proof. Since there are p2+1 subspaces and each subspace has p2 elements, it is enough to prove that the intersection of any two subspaces is {(0,0,0,0)}. It is easy to see Ca0,a1∩C∞={(0,0,0,0)}. Therefore we prove that Ca0,a1∩Ca0′,a1′={(0,0,0,0)} if a0=a0′ or a1=a1′.
Assume b0(1,a1,0,a0)+b1(0,a0,−1,a1D)=b0′(1,a1′,0,a0′)+b1′(0,a0′,−1,a1′D), then from the first and third components we have b0=b0′ and b1=b1′. Similarly, from the second and fourth components we are led to the equations
These equations can be rewritten as a matrix equation
If b0=b1=0, then the common element is (0,0,0,0). Therefore we assume b0=0 or b1=0. Then the above matrix is invertible, indeed
Here we use that b12D=b02 mod p from the assumption of D. This implies a0=a0′ and a1=a1′ which is a contradiction. □
For any a∈Zp, define subspaces by
The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). Moreover we have
Proof. The proof of the first assertion is same as Lemma 2.4. To show the second assertion, it is enough to prove Da,D∞⊂⋃a1∈ZpC0,a1∪C∞. Indeed, since each subspaces has p2 elements and the intersection is trivial, the numbers of elements in both sets are equal.
First consider a element (0,0,b0,b1) in D∞. If b0=0, then (0,0,0,b1)∈C∞. If b0=0, then
Hence D∞⊂⋃a1∈ZpC0,a1∪C∞. Next consider the element b0(1,1,−a,aD)+b1(1,2,−a,2aD) in Da. If b0+b1=0, then
Therefore we obtain Da⊂⋃a1∈ZpC0,a1∪C∞. □
Since (1,1,−a,aD)∘(1,2,−a,2aD)=1−a2D=0 by the assumption of D and (0,0,1,0)∘(0,0,0,1)=1, we obtain
by Lemma 2.3. Consequently we have the next theorem.
There are p2+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2 which are isomorphic to Mp.
Consider a 9-level quantum system M3⊗M3. We list 10 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in M9 which are isomorphic to M3:
Mpn contains Nn pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to Mp.
We define a homomorphism π^ (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4 to A⊗C by
From a similar method of the proof of Lemma 2.4, the only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). Moreover since W and S satisfy (1) and C is commutative, we have
Therefore the algebra span{π^(C^a0,a1)} generated by π^(1,0,a0,a1) and π^(0,1,a1D,a0) is isomorphic to the algebra generated by S and W, that is, Mp. Furthermore the algebra span{π^(C^∞)} generated by π^(0,0,1,0) and π^(0,0,0,1) is I⊗C. Consequently A⊗C can be decomposed by A⊗I=span{π^(C^0,0)}, I⊗C and p2−1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to Mp. We denote the p2−1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras by {BA,Ck}k=1p2−1.
pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mpn which are isomorphic to Mp. □
In this section, we consider quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mpkn which are isomorphic to Mpk. First we consider the case n=2.
GF(pk) denotes a finite field with pk elements. Up to isomorphisms, GF(pk) is unique and is defined using a polynomial
that is irreducible over the field Zp. Then we can write
for a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),a(3)(t),a(4)(t)) and b=(b(1)(t),b(2)(t),b(3)(t),b(4)(t)) in GF(pk)4. Similarly, symplectic product on Zp4k is denoted by
for u=(ui(j))1≤i≤k,1≤j≤4 and v=(vi(j))1≤i≤k,1≤j≤4 in Zp4k=(Zpk)4. From , there exist a linear functional φ on GF(pk) and a linear isomorphism π1 from GF(pk)4 to Zp4k such that
where we consider GF(pk)4 and Zp4k as vector spaces over Zp. Define a natural homomorphism (up to scalar multiple) π2 from Zp4k to Mp2k=⨂i=1kMp⊗⨂i=1kMp by
If a∘b=0 for a,b∈GF(pk)4, then the algebra A generated by
is isomorphic to Mpk, where p(t)a is defined by
Proof. If {p(t)a∣p(t)∈GF(pk)}∩{q(t)b∣q(t)∈GF(pk)}={(0,0,0,0)}, there exists r(t)∈GF(pk) such that a=r(t)b. This shows a∘b=r(t)(b∘b)=0. Hence we can assume that {p(t)a}∩{q(t)b}={(0,0,0,0)}.
For q(t)∈GF(pk), let ψq(t) be a functional on GF(pk) defined by
where we consider GF(pk) as a vector space over Zp. By (3), we have
Since a∘b=0, ψq(1)(t)=ψq(2)(t) implies q(1)(t)=q(2)(t). Therefore we obtain {ψq(t)∣q(t)∈GF(pk)}=GF(pk)∗, where GF(pk)∗ is a dual space of GF(pk).
Let {p(i)(t)}1≤i≤k be a basis of the vector space GF(pk). Then there exists a basis {q(j)}1≤j≤k⊂GF(pk) such that
For 1≤i,j≤k, let Si=I⊗i−1⊗S⊗I⊗k−i and Wj=I⊗j−1⊗W⊗I⊗k−j in Mpk=⨂kMp. We define a map ρ from {Si,Wj∣1≤i,j≤k} to A by
Then the commutativity condition of {Si,Wj}, that is,
and the commutativity condition of {π2π1(p(i)(t)a),π2π1(q(j)(t)b)∣1≤i,j≤k}, that is,
are same. Hence ρ can be extended to an isomorphism from Mpk generated by {Si,Wj}1≤i,j≤k to A. □
From this lemma, we need to find such a and b. Let D be a non-zero element in GF(pk) with the requirement that D=p(t)2 for all p(t) in GF(pk). For any a(t),b(t)∈GF(pk), define a subspace of GF(pk)4 by
The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). In particular, the subspaces expect (0,0,0,0) partition GF(pk)4\{(0,0,0,0)}.
Proof. This proof is same as Lemma 2.4. □
Since (1,b(t),0,a(t))∘(0,a(t),−1,b(t)D)=2a(t), if a(t)=0 then
For any a(t)∈GF(pk), define subspaces by
The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). Moreover we have
Proof. This proof is same as Lemma 2.5. □
Since (1,1,−a(t),a(t)D)∘(1,2,−a(t),2a(t)D)=1−a(t)2D=0 by the assumption of D and (0,0,1,0)∘(0,0,0,1)=1, we have
by Lemma 3.1. Consequently we have the next theorem.
There are p2k+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2k which are isomorphic to Mpk.
Mpkn contains N(k,n) pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to Mpk.
Define a homomorphism π^2 (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4k to A⊗C by
for (ui(j))1≤i≤k,1≤j≤4∈Zp4k. We denote other symplectic products by
for a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),a(3)(t),a(4)(t)) and b=(b(1)(t),b(2)(t),b(3)(t),b(4)(t)) in GF(pk)4, and
for u=(ui(j))1≤i≤k,1≤j≤4 and v=(vi(j))1≤i≤k,1≤j≤4 in Zp4k. Since C is commutative, we have
Moreover from , there exists a homomorphism π^1 from GF(pk)4 to Zp4k such that
Here for elements a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),0,0) and b=(0,0,b(3)(t),b(4)(t)) in GF(pk)4, we can assume
for some (ui(1)),(uj(2)),(vi(3)),(vj(4))∈Zpk. Then we can prove that the algebra generated by π^2π^1(a) and π^2π^1(b) is isomorphic to Mpk, if a∘^b=0, by using a similar proof of Lemma 3.1.
From the similar method of the proof of Lemma 2.4, the only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0). Since (1,0,a(t),b(t))∘(0,1,b(t)D,a(t))=1, we obtain
Consequently A⊗C can be decomposed by A⊗I=span{π^2π^1(C^0,0)}, I⊗C=span{π^2π^1(C^∞)} and p2k−1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to Mpk. We denote the p2k−1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras by {BA,Ck}k=1p2k−1.
for i1=i2 or j1=j2, BAi1,Cj1k1 and BAi2,Cj2k2 are quasi-orthogonal if i1=i2 or j1=j2 or k1=k2. Furthermore, BAi1,Cj1k1 is quasi-orthogonal with Ai2⊗IMp2k and IMpk(n−2)⊗Cj2 for any i2 and j2. Therefore we can decompose Mpkn by Mpk(n−2)⊗IMp2k=span{Ai⊗I}, IMpk(n−2)⊗Mp2k=span{I⊗Cj} and {BAi,Cjk}i,j,k. In consequence, we get
pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mpkn which are isomorphic to Mpk. □
References