Quasi-orthogonal subalgebras of matrix algebras

Hiromichi Ohno

Introduction

We consider pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras A1,A2,,Al{\cal A}_{1},{\cal A}_{2},\ldots,{\cal A}_{l} in MpknM_{p^{kn}} which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}} for k1k\geq 1, n2n\geq 2 and a prime number pp with p3p\geq 3. The aim of this paper is to obtain the maximum ll. The case p=2p=2, n=2n=2 and k=1k=1 is shown in and the maximum is 44.

The motivations of this problem are followings. If a total system MnMmM_{n}\otimes M_{m} has a statistical operator ρ\rho, we can reconstruct the reduced density ρn(1)=Trmρ\rho_{n}^{(1)}={\rm Tr}_{m}\rho in the subsystem MnM_{n}, where Trm{\rm Tr}_{m} is a partial trace onto MnM_{n}. In order to get more information, we change the density ρ\rho by an interaction. For a Hamiltonian HH, the new state is

after the interaction. The new reduced density is ρn(2)=TrmW1ρW1\rho_{n}^{(2)}={\rm Tr}_{m}W_{1}\rho W_{1}^{*}. By using other interactions, we have a sequence of reduced states ρn(1),ρn(2),,ρn(k)\rho_{n}^{(1)},\rho_{n}^{(2)},\ldots,\rho_{n}^{(k)}. We want to determine the minimum kk such that this sequence of reduced densities determines ρ\rho.

Another reason comes from the relation to the mutually unbiased bases (MUB) problem. Given a orthonormal basis of an nn-dimensional Hilbert space H{\cal H}, the linear operators diagonal in this basis form a maximal Abelian subalgebra of MnB(H)M_{n}\simeq{\cal B}({\cal H}). Conversely if eiei|e_{i}\rangle\langle e_{i}| are minimal projections in a maximal Abelian subalgebra, then (ei)i(|e_{i}\rangle)_{i} is a orthonormal basis. Two maximal Abelian subalgebras of MnM_{n} are quasi-orthogonal if and only if the two corresponding bases (ξi)(\xi_{i}) and (ζj)(\zeta_{j}) are mutually unbiased (see Proposition 2.2), that is,

Mutually unbiased bases are very interesting from many point of view and the maximal number of such bases is not known for arbitrary nn. We want to study mutually unbiased bases in terms of quasi-orthogonal subalgebras (see ).

In Section 2, we consider quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in MpnM_{p^{n}} which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}. In Section 3, quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in MpknM_{p^{kn}} which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}} are investigated.

A{\cal A} is a finite dimensional CC^{*}-algebra with the usual trace Tr{\rm Tr} and is considered as a Hilbert space under the inner product

Two subalgebras A1{\cal A}_{1} and A2{\cal A}_{2} of A{\cal A} are called quasi-orthogonal if

The equivalent conditions of this definition are followings :

(a) For any A1A1A_{1}\in{\cal A}_{1} and A2A2A_{2}\in{\cal A}_{2},

(b) For any A1A1A_{1}\in{\cal A}_{1} and A2A2A_{2}\in{\cal A}_{2} with Tr(A1)=Tr(A2)=0{\rm Tr}(A_{1})={\rm Tr}(A_{2})=0,

The theory of quasi-orthogonal subalgebras is related to the theory of mutually unbiased bases. This is stated as follows:

From (a), we conclude that {ξi}\{\xi_{i}\} and {ζj}\{\zeta_{j}\} are mutually unbiased bases if and only if the algebras generated by {Pi}\{P_{i}\} and {Qj}\{Q_{j}\} are quasi-orthogonal. This prove the assertion. \square

Now we consider the quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2=MpMpM_{p^{2}}=M_{p}\otimes M_{p} which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}, where pp is a prime number with p3p\geq 3. We will show that we can construct p2+1p^{2}+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras.

Define the unitary operators WW and SS in MpM_{p} by

where λ=e2πi/p\lambda=e^{2\pi i/p}. Then these two unitary operators have following properties:

The set {SiWj}0i,jp1\{S^{i}W^{j}\}_{0\leq i,j\leq p-1} is a natural orthogonal basis of MpM_{p}.

From (1), Sk1Wl1S^{k_{1}}W^{l_{1}} and Sk2Wl2S^{k_{2}}W^{l_{2}} commute if and only if k1l2=k2l1k_{1}l_{2}=k_{2}l_{1} mod pp.

We consider the commutativity condition iv in the context of a vector space over ZpZ_{p}, where ZpZ_{p} is a finite field with pp elements. Let Zp4={(k1,l1,k2,l2)k1,l1,k2,l2Zp}Z_{p}^{4}=\{(k_{1},l_{1},k_{2},l_{2})\,|\,k_{1},l_{1},k_{2},l_{2}\in Z_{p}\} be a vector space over ZpZ_{p} and define a natural homomorphism π\pi (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4Z_{p}^{4} to MpMpM_{p}\otimes M_{p} by

where u=(k1,l1,k2,l2)u=(k_{1},l_{1},k_{2},l_{2}) and u=(k1,l1,k2,l2)u^{\prime}=(k_{1}^{\prime},l_{1}^{\prime},k_{2}^{\prime},l_{2}^{\prime}). From (1),

Hence π(u)\pi(u) and π(u)\pi(u^{\prime}) commute if and only if their symplectic product equals zero.

If π(u)\pi(u) and π(u)\pi(u^{\prime}) are not commutative for u=(k1,l1,k2,l2),u=(k1,l1,k2,l2)Zp4u=(k_{1},l_{1},k_{2},l_{2}),\,u^{\prime}=(k_{1}^{\prime},l_{1}^{\prime},k_{2}^{\prime},l_{2}^{\prime})\in Z_{p}^{4}, then the algebra A{\cal A} generated by π(u)\pi(u) and π(u)\pi(u^{\prime}) is isomorphic to MpM_{p}.

Proof. From the assumption, uu0u\circ u^{\prime}\neq 0. Define a map ρ\rho from {S,Wuu}\{S,W^{u\circ u^{\prime}}\} to A{\cal A} by

From (2) and SWuu=λuuWuuSSW^{u\circ u^{\prime}}=\lambda^{-u\circ u^{\prime}}W^{u\circ u^{\prime}}S, the commutativity condition of π(u)\pi(u), π(u)\pi(u^{\prime}) and that of SS, WuuW^{u\circ u^{\prime}} are same. Therefore ρ\rho can be extended to an isomorphism from MpM_{p} generated by SS and WuuW^{u\circ u^{\prime}} to A{\cal A}. \square

From this lemma, we need to find such uu and uu^{\prime}. Let DD be a non-zero integer in ZpZ^{p} with the requirement that Dk2D\neq k^{2} mod pp for all kk in ZpZ_{p}, i.e., DD is not a quadratic residue of pp. For any a0,a1Zpa_{0},a_{1}\in Z_{p}, we define a subspace of Zp4Z_{p}^{4} by

where scalar multiplication and addition are defined by a natural way. Moreover put

The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). In particular, the subspaces expect (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0) partition Zp4\{(0,0,0,0)}Z_{p}^{4}\backslash\{(0,0,0,0)\}.

Proof. Since there are p2+1p^{2}+1 subspaces and each subspace has p2p^{2} elements, it is enough to prove that the intersection of any two subspaces is {(0,0,0,0)}\{(0,0,0,0)\}. It is easy to see Ca0,a1C={(0,0,0,0)}C_{a_{0},a_{1}}\cap C_{\infty}=\{(0,0,0,0)\}. Therefore we prove that Ca0,a1Ca0,a1={(0,0,0,0)}C_{a_{0},a_{1}}\cap C_{a_{0}^{\prime},a_{1}^{\prime}}=\{(0,0,0,0)\} if a0a0a_{0}\neq a_{0}^{\prime} or a1a1a_{1}\neq a_{1}^{\prime}.

Assume b0(1,a1,0,a0)+b1(0,a0,1,a1D)=b0(1,a1,0,a0)+b1(0,a0,1,a1D)b_{0}(1,a_{1},0,a_{0})+b_{1}(0,a_{0},-1,a_{1}D)=b_{0}^{\prime}(1,a_{1}^{\prime},0,a_{0}^{\prime})+b_{1}^{\prime}(0,a_{0}^{\prime},-1,a_{1}^{\prime}D), then from the first and third components we have b0=b0b_{0}=b_{0}^{\prime} and b1=b1b_{1}=b_{1}^{\prime}. Similarly, from the second and fourth components we are led to the equations

These equations can be rewritten as a matrix equation

If b0=b1=0b_{0}=b_{1}=0, then the common element is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). Therefore we assume b00b_{0}\neq 0 or b10b_{1}\neq 0. Then the above matrix is invertible, indeed

Here we use that b12Db02b_{1}^{2}D\neq b_{0}^{2} mod pp from the assumption of DD. This implies a0=a0a_{0}=a_{0}^{\prime} and a1=a1a_{1}=a_{1}^{\prime} which is a contradiction. \square

For any aZpa\in Z_{p}, define subspaces by

The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). Moreover we have

Proof. The proof of the first assertion is same as Lemma 2.4. To show the second assertion, it is enough to prove Da,Da1ZpC0,a1CD_{a},D_{\infty}\subset\bigcup_{a_{1}\in Z_{p}}C_{0,a_{1}}\cup C_{\infty}. Indeed, since each subspaces has p2p^{2} elements and the intersection is trivial, the numbers of elements in both sets are equal.

First consider a element (0,0,b0,b1)(0,0,b_{0},b_{1}) in DD_{\infty}. If b0=0b_{0}=0, then (0,0,0,b1)C(0,0,0,b_{1})\in C_{\infty}. If b00b_{0}\neq 0, then

Hence Da1ZpC0,a1CD_{\infty}\subset\bigcup_{a_{1}\in Z_{p}}C_{0,a_{1}}\cup C_{\infty}. Next consider the element b0(1,1,a,aD)+b1(1,2,a,2aD)b_{0}(1,1,-a,aD)+b_{1}(1,2,-a,2aD) in DaD_{a}. If b0+b1=0b_{0}+b_{1}=0, then

Therefore we obtain Daa1ZpC0,a1CD_{a}\subset\bigcup_{a_{1}\in Z_{p}}C_{0,a_{1}}\cup C_{\infty}. \square

Since (1,1,a,aD)(1,2,a,2aD)=1a2D0(1,1,-a,aD)\circ(1,2,-a,2aD)=1-a^{2}D\neq 0 by the assumption of DD and (0,0,1,0)(0,0,0,1)=1(0,0,1,0)\circ(0,0,0,1)=1, we obtain

by Lemma 2.3. Consequently we have the next theorem.

There are p2+1p^{2}+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2M_{p^{2}} which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}.

Consider a 99-level quantum system M3M3M_{3}\otimes M_{3}. We list 1010 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in M9M_{9} which are isomorphic to M3M_{3}:

MpnM_{p^{n}} contains NnN_{n} pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}.

We define a homomorphism π^\hat{\pi} (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4{Z}_{p}^{4} to AC{\cal A}\otimes{\cal C} by

From a similar method of the proof of Lemma 2.4, the only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). Moreover since WW and SS satisfy (1) and C{\cal C} is commutative, we have

Therefore the algebra span{π^(C^a0,a1)}{\rm span}\{\hat{\pi}(\hat{C}_{a_{0},a_{1}})\} generated by π^(1,0,a0,a1)\hat{\pi}(1,0,a_{0},a_{1}) and π^(0,1,a1D,a0)\hat{\pi}(0,1,a_{1}D,a_{0}) is isomorphic to the algebra generated by SS and WW, that is, MpM_{p}. Furthermore the algebra span{π^(C^)}{\rm span}\{\hat{\pi}(\hat{C}_{\infty})\} generated by π^(0,0,1,0)\hat{\pi}(0,0,1,0) and π^(0,0,0,1)\hat{\pi}(0,0,0,1) is ICI\otimes{\cal C}. Consequently AC{\cal A}\otimes{\cal C} can be decomposed by AI=span{π^(C^0,0)}{\cal A}\otimes I={\rm span}\{\hat{\pi}(\hat{C}_{0,0})\}, ICI\otimes{\cal C} and p21p^{2}-1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}. We denote the p21p^{2}-1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras by {BA,Ck}k=1p21\{{\cal B}_{{\cal A},{\cal C}}^{k}\}_{k=1}^{p^{2}-1}.

pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in MpnM_{p^{n}} which are isomorphic to MpM_{p}. \square

In this section, we consider quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in MpknM_{p^{kn}} which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}. First we consider the case n=2n=2.

GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) denotes a finite field with pkp^{k} elements. Up to isomorphisms, GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) is unique and is defined using a polynomial

that is irreducible over the field Zp{Z}_{p}. Then we can write

for a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),a(3)(t),a(4)(t))a=(a^{(1)}(t),a^{(2)}(t),a^{(3)}(t),a^{(4)}(t)) and b=(b(1)(t),b(2)(t),b(3)(t),b(4)(t))b=(b^{(1)}(t),b^{(2)}(t),b^{(3)}(t),b^{(4)}(t)) in GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4}. Similarly, symplectic product on Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} is denoted by

for u=(ui(j))1ik,1j4u=(u_{i}^{(j)})_{1\leq i\leq k,1\leq j\leq 4} and v=(vi(j))1ik,1j4v=(v_{i}^{(j)})_{1\leq i\leq k,1\leq j\leq 4} in Zp4k=(Zpk)4Z_{p}^{4k}=(Z_{p}^{k})^{4}. From , there exist a linear functional φ\varphi on GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) and a linear isomorphism π1\pi_{1} from GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4} to Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} such that

where we consider GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4} and Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} as vector spaces over ZpZ_{p}. Define a natural homomorphism (up to scalar multiple) π2\pi_{2} from Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} to Mp2k=i=1kMpi=1kMpM_{p^{2k}}=\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k}M_{p}\otimes\bigotimes_{i=1}^{k}M_{p} by

If ab0a\circ b\neq 0 for a,bGF(pk)4a,b\in GF(p^{k})^{4}, then the algebra A{\cal A} generated by

is isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}, where p(t)ap(t)a is defined by

Proof. If {p(t)ap(t)GF(pk)}{q(t)bq(t)GF(pk)}{(0,0,0,0)}\{p(t)a\,|\,p(t)\in GF(p^{k})\}\cap\{q(t)b\,|\,q(t)\in GF(p^{k})\}\neq\{(0,0,0,0)\}, there exists r(t)GF(pk)r(t)\in GF(p^{k}) such that a=r(t)ba=r(t)b. This shows ab=r(t)(bb)=0a\circ b=r(t)(b\circ b)=0. Hence we can assume that {p(t)a}{q(t)b}={(0,0,0,0)}\{p(t)a\}\cap\{q(t)b\}=\{(0,0,0,0)\}.

For q(t)GF(pk)q(t)\in GF(p^{k}), let ψq(t)\psi_{q(t)} be a functional on GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) defined by

where we consider GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) as a vector space over ZpZ_{p}. By (3), we have

Since ab0a\circ b\neq 0, ψq(1)(t)=ψq(2)(t)\psi_{q^{(1)}(t)}=\psi_{q^{(2)}(t)} implies q(1)(t)=q(2)(t)q^{(1)}(t)=q^{(2)}(t). Therefore we obtain {ψq(t)q(t)GF(pk)}=GF(pk)\{\psi_{q(t)}\,|\,q(t)\in GF(p^{k})\}=GF(p^{k})^{*}, where GF(pk)GF(p^{k})^{*} is a dual space of GF(pk)GF(p^{k}).

Let {p(i)(t)}1ik\{p^{(i)}(t)\}_{1\leq i\leq k} be a basis of the vector space GF(pk)GF(p^{k}). Then there exists a basis {q(j)}1jkGF(pk)\{q^{(j)}\}_{1\leq j\leq k}\subset GF(p^{k}) such that

For 1i,jk1\leq i,j\leq k, let Si=Ii1SIkiS_{i}=I^{\otimes i-1}\otimes S\otimes I^{\otimes k-i} and Wj=Ij1WIkjW_{j}=I^{\otimes j-1}\otimes W\otimes I^{\otimes k-j} in Mpk=kMpM_{p^{k}}=\bigotimes^{k}M_{p}. We define a map ρ\rho from {Si,Wj1i,jk}\{S_{i},W_{j}\,|\,1\leq i,j\leq k\} to A{\cal A} by

Then the commutativity condition of {Si,Wj}\{S_{i},W_{j}\}, that is,

and the commutativity condition of {π2π1(p(i)(t)a),π2π1(q(j)(t)b)1i,jk}\{\pi_{2}\pi_{1}(p^{(i)}(t)a),\pi_{2}\pi_{1}(q^{(j)}(t)b)\,|\,1\leq i,j\leq k\}, that is,

are same. Hence ρ\rho can be extended to an isomorphism from MpkM_{p^{k}} generated by {Si,Wj}1i,jk\{S_{i},W_{j}\}_{1\leq i,j\leq k} to A{\cal A}. \square

From this lemma, we need to find such aa and bb. Let DD be a non-zero element in GF(pk)GF(p^{k}) with the requirement that Dp(t)2D\neq p(t)^{2} for all p(t)p(t) in GF(pk)GF(p^{k}). For any a(t),b(t)GF(pk)a(t),b(t)\in GF(p^{k}), define a subspace of GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4} by

The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). In particular, the subspaces expect (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0) partition GF(pk)4\{(0,0,0,0)}GF(p^{k})^{4}\backslash\{(0,0,0,0)\}.

Proof. This proof is same as Lemma 2.4. \square

Since (1,b(t),0,a(t))(0,a(t),1,b(t)D)=2a(t)(1,b(t),0,a(t))\circ(0,a(t),-1,b(t)D)=2a(t), if a(t)0a(t)\neq 0 then

For any a(t)GF(pk)a(t)\in GF(p^{k}), define subspaces by

The only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). Moreover we have

Proof. This proof is same as Lemma 2.5. \square

Since (1,1,a(t),a(t)D)(1,2,a(t),2a(t)D)=1a(t)2D0(1,1,-a(t),a(t)D)\circ(1,2,-a(t),2a(t)D)=1-a(t)^{2}D\neq 0 by the assumption of DD and (0,0,1,0)(0,0,0,1)=1(0,0,1,0)\circ(0,0,0,1)=1, we have

by Lemma 3.1. Consequently we have the next theorem.

There are p2k+1p^{2k}+1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in Mp2kM_{p^{2k}} which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}.

MpknM_{p^{kn}} contains N(k,n)N_{(k,n)} pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}.

Define a homomorphism π^2\hat{\pi}_{2} (up to scalar multiple) from Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} to AC{\cal A}\otimes{\cal C} by

for (ui(j))1ik,1j4Zp4k(u_{i}^{(j)})_{1\leq i\leq k,1\leq j\leq 4}\in Z_{p}^{4k}. We denote other symplectic products by

for a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),a(3)(t),a(4)(t))a=(a^{(1)}(t),a^{(2)}(t),a^{(3)}(t),a^{(4)}(t)) and b=(b(1)(t),b(2)(t),b(3)(t),b(4)(t))b=(b^{(1)}(t),b^{(2)}(t),b^{(3)}(t),b^{(4)}(t)) in GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4}, and

for u=(ui(j))1ik,1j4u=(u_{i}^{(j)})_{1\leq i\leq k,1\leq j\leq 4} and v=(vi(j))1ik,1j4v=(v_{i}^{(j)})_{1\leq i\leq k,1\leq j\leq 4} in Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k}. Since C{\cal C} is commutative, we have

Moreover from , there exists a homomorphism π^1\hat{\pi}_{1} from GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4} to Zp4kZ_{p}^{4k} such that

Here for elements a=(a(1)(t),a(2)(t),0,0)a=(a^{(1)}(t),a^{(2)}(t),0,0) and b=(0,0,b(3)(t),b(4)(t))b=(0,0,b^{(3)}(t),b^{(4)}(t)) in GF(pk)4GF(p^{k})^{4}, we can assume

for some (ui(1)),(uj(2)),(vi(3)),(vj(4))Zpk(u_{i}^{(1)}),(u_{j}^{(2)}),(v_{i}^{(3)}),(v_{j}^{(4)})\in Z_{p}^{k}. Then we can prove that the algebra generated by π^2π^1(a)\hat{\pi}_{2}\hat{\pi}_{1}(a) and π^2π^1(b)\hat{\pi}_{2}\hat{\pi}_{1}(b) is isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}, if a^b0a\hat{\circ}b\neq 0, by using a similar proof of Lemma 3.1.

From the similar method of the proof of Lemma 2.4, the only vector common to any pair of above subspaces is (0,0,0,0)(0,0,0,0). Since (1,0,a(t),b(t))(0,1,b(t)D,a(t))=1(1,0,a(t),b(t))\circ(0,1,b(t)D,a(t))=1, we obtain

Consequently AC{\cal A}\otimes{\cal C} can be decomposed by AI=span{π^2π^1(C^0,0)}{\cal A}\otimes I={\rm span}\{\hat{\pi}_{2}\hat{\pi}_{1}(\hat{C}_{0,0})\}, IC=span{π^2π^1(C^)}I\otimes{\cal C}={\rm span}\{\hat{\pi}_{2}\hat{\pi}_{1}(\hat{C}_{\infty})\} and p2k1p^{2k}-1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}. We denote the p2k1p^{2k}-1 pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras by {BA,Ck}k=1p2k1\{{\cal B}_{{\cal A},{\cal C}}^{k}\}_{k=1}^{p^{2k}-1}.

for i1i2i_{1}\neq i_{2} or j1j2j_{1}\neq j_{2}, BAi1,Cj1k1{\cal B}_{{\cal A}_{i_{1}},{\cal C}_{j_{1}}}^{k_{1}} and BAi2,Cj2k2{\cal B}_{{\cal A}_{i_{2}},{\cal C}_{j_{2}}}^{k_{2}} are quasi-orthogonal if i1i2i_{1}\neq i_{2} or j1j2j_{1}\neq j_{2} or k1k2k_{1}\neq k_{2}. Furthermore, BAi1,Cj1k1{\cal B}_{{\cal A}_{i_{1}},{\cal C}_{j_{1}}}^{k_{1}} is quasi-orthogonal with Ai2IMp2k{\cal A}_{i_{2}}\otimes I_{M_{p^{2k}}} and IMpk(n2)Cj2I_{M_{p^{k(n-2)}}}\otimes{\cal C}_{j_{2}} for any i2i_{2} and j2j_{2}. Therefore we can decompose MpknM_{p^{kn}} by Mpk(n2)IMp2k=span{AiI}M_{p^{k(n-2)}}\otimes I_{M_{p^{2k}}}={\rm span}\{{\cal A}_{i}\otimes I\}, IMpk(n2)Mp2k=span{ICj}I_{M_{p^{k(n-2)}}}\otimes M_{p^{2k}}={\rm span}\{I\otimes{\cal C}_{j}\} and {BAi,Cjk}i,j,k\{{\cal B}_{{\cal A}_{i},{\cal C}_{j}}^{k}\}_{i,j,k}. In consequence, we get

pairwise quasi-orthogonal subalgebras in MpknM_{p^{kn}} which are isomorphic to MpkM_{p^{k}}. \square

References